The Nuance of Improved Inputs

Mar 22, 2020, 1:42 AM

by Luke Weinhagen

P often looks like a competing interpretation of philosophy or a competing ideology. When what is really offers is fidelity and disambiguity to the underlying concepts of all philosophy and ideology (at differing costs to each).

In the case of UPB this clarity comes from discovery of a superior definition of property.

In the case of NAP this clarity comes in the form of identification of full-accounting.

So, counter-reaction is usually misaligned nuance I think. The nuance is in being able to see these simply as improved inputs and not as just making the original work wrong.