—“I’ve never noticed physicists to be humbled, but I believe that the physical world has disciplined them to recognize that if they don’t wish to look foolish it’s best to learn to partition their questions so that they only ask the questions which are robust to the errors within any given theory.”–Eric Weinstein
Agreed. So the question is why we don’t simply save all civilization by limiting speech to the public in matters public to that which is robust to errors within a given theory AND is reciprocal, testifiable, and within limits of restitutability?
I mean, that’s what P-Law does right? It criminalizes indiscipline, false promise, baiting into hazard, undermining, sedition and TREASON against the natural law, testimony according to that law, and the european tradition of building a scientific system of thought, society, economy, and government.
Why? Because science is just another name for testimony, and testimony under threat of perjury is how you stop the lying.