Robert Laird
Incoherent nonsense.
Curt Doolittle
Not an argument. A dunning kruger assertion.
Robert Laird
Friends with Yuri N Maltsev and 4 others
Not an argument. You’re right. Just my judgment that you’ve produced incoherent nonsense. Lots of people think they know how to write. Almost all of them are wrong. You’re in that bunch.
Curt Doolittle
I do my craft in public like an old village smith. People can watch the process. FB is not my end result but my sketch pad. And people can join along in the journey with me.
So, you know, I don’t ‘compose’ every idea I put down. …See More
Robert Laird
I’m twice the writer you’ve ever been. You’re pretentious, sententious, and a bore. Don’t patronize me, or I’ll have a real fling at you.
Curt Doolittle
I’m baiting you as I bait all critics, in to making a substantive argument. I have never claimed to be a great writer… I claim only to be right. ;)
So dish it if you can. ;)
Robert Laird
Village smith. What a joke. You drape words around half baked ideas. I really am a great writer. My wife asks, “Why bother with this guy?” I tell her I have a duty to mess with the incoherent poseurs. I’m probably wrong. Don’t care how many “follow” you. You’re a fool on a fool’s mission. You can’t write a single paragraph. Why I poked at you in the first place. Go away now. You haven’t earned another word.
Curt Doolittle
Now, any sophist of any scale will argue quite obviously that you make no argument whatsoever. But then intuitionistically accessible prose illustrating the mundane, is quite different from the composition of novel argument.
So. Given that ‘incomprehensibility’ has been a sophist’s criticism that I’ve lived with for decades, and yet there are plenty of people (demonstrably) who can grasp the insights, and who are ‘moved’ by them, it’s just an empirically demonstrated fact that I’m producing novel content.
Now if you have an argument (I know you don’t, or you would make one, like those who do form criticisms) then please make one.
As far as I know I have NO, meaning ZERO material critics, but many empty hats railing against that which they cannot grasp.
What I have done here is profound. And until you can construct an argument against one of the central propositions you’re just a poser. (which is common.)
Dunning Kruger rules you. 😉