? Regarding:
—“I suppose it means we just accept our fate, without any resistance or action?”— Rockwell.
Well, we showed up. At personal cost. At personal risk. We launched a campaign, we delivered a strategy, and a set of demands, and what happened? Morons cared about john maintaining his anonymity, and me sweating and getting heat exhaustion in the hot July sun, and pandering to BLM to prevent a dispute with the second amendment crowd, so that we didn’t have another catastrophic failure like Charlottesville.
They didn’t care that we did something. That we showed up. That we launched a campaign. Or paied attention to our message. And didn’t defend us when were undermined by Christians, Nazis, and White Nationalists for taking the same approach as the founders instead of extremist positions – despite the fact that our solution would have provided for christians, separatists, ethnocentrists, and statists, to continue the big sort, and establish regional cultures. Nor that if the solution was refused by the public or the state, then the state had defacto admitted to being the enemy of the people’s right to self-determination by self-determined means. An as such we would have the moral hight ground in a civil war, and a plan for the settlement of the civil war in everyone’s interests (restoring the original constitution and the alliance of independent states).
So, before you or anyone else complains: Did you show? Would you show? What would it take for you to show up? If you didn’t show, then Did you defend john, I, and the rest of the leadership online? Did you spread our message online? Did you donate to john (or the institute?)
You see, most of the leave-me-alone right wants to prep and let others do the work, while they hide – as if hiding will do anything other than let the left win. The ‘loser-right’ just wants to rage. The incel right wants the optics of better men fighting for them while they cower in basements behind keyboards. The ‘decent right’ wants someone else to solve the problem or won’t show until others have shown first, and have born all the risk. And the few people who want to solve the problem and are willing to show are too angry and impulsive to tolerate a political-first rather than military-first strategy. So the only strategy anyone will show up for is military-first, but a military-first strategy without political solutions will fail because resistance will be too high, and oppression and violence against them economically, politically, and socially justified.
So only a tiny number will fund a movement, only a few people show up for it, and even fewer of those who show will take a winning strategy, and no matter what, the Christians and the Nazis will complain that we aren’t advocating for Christian tyranny of ignorance and superstition, or nazi tyranny of economic ignorance and pseudoscience, when self-selection of these ‘theology-philosophy-ideologies’ are just measures of one’s ignorance of operating an empire, a state, a military, a government, an economy, and a society, with the only operational means of doing so with any degree of non-corruption: the law and a market for the prosecution of treason, corruption, theft, fraud, violence, and murder under that law.
Knowing what to do. It wasn’t hard to figure out. But without controlling the public narrative we can’t reduce resistance so that the state capitulates without reducing the country to ashes. But you can’t fix stupid. You can’t convince arrogant. You can’t fund a movement with people who won’t contribute just a little money. You can’t fight with cowards and no shows. And you can’t rally a movement with Christians and Nazis undermining every step you take. So, like I’ve said. I’ll show up. I know how to win. But there are too few good people. Because whites are lazy privileged, soft, spoiled children that want better men to save them. The dissident right, the loser right, is as impoverished, disenfranchised, and infantilized as the dissident left. And because of these behaviors, we can’t bring about a peaceful settlement, and we can’t even organize into enough of a threat to reach an non-peaceful settlement, and we certainly can’t execute a strategy that will win against our ancient enemy, the left, a frightened populace, a frightened government, and a frightened financial sector, and a military that has been gutted of all Prussian discipline, and constitutional conviction.
And so it’s pretty clear the left and the state will win by continuing the process of incremental suppression of opinion, organization, funding, and then gradually picking off outliers, until the few that are left who are willing to fight are overwhelmed by events.
So yes, fate is sealed. Because the right is too stupid, too ignorant, too infantilized, too poor, too lazy, and too cowardly to follow, fund, advocate, and show up for, a strategy that will win.
To win requires a small number of men who will stay in the field and fight for three to six months, a set of demands that the majority of our own population finds desirable, a set of demands that the opposition doesn’t find undesirable, and where the enemy is the state and the financial sector thus turning the entire population in one way or another into the enemy of the academy-state-financial sector that is the source of the conflict of our age.