Mar 23, 2020, 2:01 PM
OWNING
The concept of ‘own’ cannot come into existence without others to compete with you for control of something, and as such as a means of enforcement by self, or others, justifying retaliation.
Without others:
|ACTIONS| I know of something or not > I act to bear a cost of it or not > I take physical control of it or not > i defend it or not > i engage in reciprocal defense of others or not (Property Ownership) > we construct institutions of defense or not (Rights Title).
So, interest, where interest = born a cost.
|INTEREST| potential interest > demonstrated interest > demonstrated possession > demonstrated defense > demonstrated reciprocal defense (property, ownership) > demonstrated institutional defense (property rights, title).
You can demonstrate an potential interest, demonstrated interest, possession, independent of others.
You can only demonstrate defense, property-ownership, rights-title with others.
I mean. that’s a proof. In other words, that’s a set of series that fully disambiguate all dimensions, and prevents the use of sophistry (deceit) by conflation.
We retroactively apply the terms rights property ownership given that we habituate the terms under our laws. But these terms are dependent on those laws and institutions – produced with others.
Notice how I use “demonstrated” – meaning actions.
Notice how I don’t use ‘ideals’ (Platonisms) without defining them operationally as how they came into being.
You see?
P uses this technique of disambiguation by operationalization, and serialization. This transforms what we call ‘logic’ into a system of measurment.