USEFUL IDIOTS FOR THE ENEMY: NAP-ADDICTS
The NAP?
Really?
- Define aggression, and aggression against what? How do you know what aggression means, and how do you know what constitutes aggression against what?
a) define aggression?
b) against what?
c) who determines it’s aggression and how? 2. The litmus test is blackmail. Is blackmail aggression? 3. What is the minimum scope of property necessary for a polity to survive competition for territory and people? How do you know that? 4. What is the minimum scope of contributions to the production of commons (defense, common goods and services) sufficient for a polity to survive competition for territory, population, and political control? How do you know that? 5. Why can’t I proactively defend myself on my terms rather than wait until an opposition individual, group, organization, or state conducts violence, harm, theft, fraud, socialization of losses, free riding, rent seeking, corruption, immigration, conversion, undermining, warfare, conquest?
Once you realize you’re a useful idiot it will probably make you angry that you were a useful idiot and then you will go thru a period of hating the enemy for baiting you in to useful idiocy, but the fact remains – you are a useful idiot if you bought the NAP instead of rule of law by sovereignty and reciprocity where property consists of demonstrated interests.
You and your opinion don’t matter. The market determines all of these – not you.