Mar 14, 2020, 7:23 PM
P-law argues against shaming and moralizing as substitute for or avoidance of argument, not as disincentive for irreciprocity (immorality).
I don’t know why visiting Thai Hookers is irreciprocal with the in group. I think it puts pressure on one’s virtue signaling – meaning worthiness for imitation – because it’s a signal of low sexual social economic market value to some, but for most I think it’s just reducing the cost of sex by reducing it to purely transactional.
Hookers are expensive per transaction but there are no or few external costs. Relationships have high external costs. They may have high external rewards. But only if those rewards are of subjective value to you.
Long and short of it is that GSRRM is the correct response to avoiding an argument, and for suppressing virtue signaling, but that’s all. I don’t know the context but it sounds like crossing signals between different sexual value markets.