. . .

IMPORTANT: Whether we say truth is a constraint of reciprocity, or reciprocity is a constraint of truth, depends on whether the context of the question is decidability in law (top-down) or decidability in physics (bottom-up). But it’s the same either way.

—“Truth is what we test for in claims, reciprocity is what we test for in propositions.”— Martin Stepan

METHOD: The method we use is exhaustive disambiguation, by serialization (into measurements), operationalization (commensurability of measurements), synthesis (commensurability of processes), incentives (opportunity), equilibria(counter opportunity. ie: Constructivism as falsificationism.

IMPORTANT: Whether we say truth is a constraint of reciprocity, or reciprocity is a constraint of truth, depends on whether the context of the question is decidability in law (top-down) or decidability in physics (bottom-up). But it’s the same either way.#

—“Truth is what we test for in claims, reciprocity is what we test for in propositions.”— Martin Stepan#

METHOD: The method we use is exhaustive disambiguation, by serialization (into measurements), operationalization (commensurability of measurements), synthesis (commensurability of processes), incentives (opportunity), equilibria(counter opportunity. ie: Constructivism as falsificationism.#

IMPORTANT: Whether we say truth is a constraint of reciprocity, or reciprocity is a constraint of truth, depends on whether the context of the question is decidability in law (top-down) or decidability in physics (bottom-up). But it’s the same either way.

—“Truth is what we test for in claims, reciprocity is what we test for in propositions.”— Martin Stepan

METHOD: The method we use is exhaustive disambiguation, by serialization (into measurements), operationalization (commensurability of measurements), synthesis (commensurability of processes), incentives (opportunity), equilibria(counter opportunity. ie: Constructivism as falsificationism.