by Lisa Outhwaite
There’s a lot of talk on how women are particularly gullible when it comes to abandoning their tribe or being vulnerable to psychological attack by subversive movements etc. and I’ve got to say that, whilst I understand the emotional need in intellectually forcing women into submission, the arguments themselves are quite skewed.
How many wars have men been propagandised into fighting on behalf of their enemies? Even as far back as 1900, members of the British Parliament were bemoaning the extent to which the British army was being utilised to serve Jewish interests:
—‘“Wherever we examine, there is a financial Jew operating, directing and inspiring the agonies that have led to this war…the British army which used to be used for all good causes…has become the janissary of the Jews” – John Burns, before a full House of Commons.
Jews have frequently manipulated the Nordic man’s love of heroism and noble warfare, using him as a war-mutt to expand their power base. (CD: as well as neoconservatism in the usa)
It was an all male government, high on universal values and weakened by civilised living, that first granted Jews the right to stand as MPs. Freely handing the reins of power and protection for their tribe over to an openly hostile out-group. Naturally, they made short work of that error by securing 16 further Jewish MPs and a Jewish Prime Minister, who openly advocated for Jewish racial supremacy, in just a few short decades.
That natural nobility in European men and a propensity to seek justice is counterbalanced by an idealism bordering on naive. (CD: the down side of heroism)
I’m happy and willing to discuss where women have dropped the ball but that analysis needs some balance now. If for no other reason than that a continual shifting of blame only serves to further weaken true masculine strength.
(CD: Argument has been made many times that expansionary Christianity, Commerce, and Moralism are just excuses for exercising Aryanism)