(FB 1552608800 Timestamp)
APPARENTLY TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A PHILOSOPHER YOU MUST MAKE YOUR IDEA ACCESSIBLE TO 5 YEAR OLDS
—“Curt is not a philosopher by any means. He cannot even understand his own Confusion in order to boil it down into a simple manner in which common folk can grasp it instantly. If you cannot explain your ideas to a 5 year old child without them understanding them logically – you fail to comprehend yet, you own thoughts and imaginations in order to be able to judge them with discernment and thus avoid making a fool of yourself…”—Nacherel Tav
This is a lie right?
Can you explain programming to a five year old?
The formal logics?
Arithmetic, Geometry, Calculus, analysis and algebra?
No you can’t.
When Propertarianism is indifferent from writing law in a formal logic in a formal syntax, just like programming, with a formal set of types,.
I can diagram all of it in about eight slides.
But it’s a university degree level discipline.
What you mean is I can’t produce an IDEOLOGY.
Do you understand Kant, or Heidegger, or Aristotle or even darwin? Well, P is slightly easier than each. Precisely because it is formal.
So if those men are philosophers then why am I not?