(FB 1550015417 Timestamp)
CHANTING THE CORE 😉
Given:
Any statement passes the tests of:
– categorically consistent (identity)
– internally consistent (Logically consistent)
– externally correspondent (empirically consistent)
– existentially consistent (operationally stated)
– scope consistent (limits and full accounting)
– rational (subjectively consistent – incentives )
– reciprocal (reciprocally subjectively consistent – exchanges)
– with these warranties of due diligence,
– within the limits of possible restitution,
Therefore:
– Any such display word or deed;
– is free of imposition of costs,
And Therefore;
– free of retaliation.
And Therefore;
– it is truthful and moral.
We can never know if a statement is true (“critical naturalism”).
We can only know that we have exhausted due diligence sufficient for the demand for due diligence given the promise, claim, testimony we are making.
This is Propertarian Natural Law’s epistemology:
… “Testimonialism’:
… … “The completion of the scientific method”,
… … … or what some call
… … … … ‘Critical Naturalism’.