—“Curt: Please Define ‘Post-Moral’?”–

October 27th, 2018 8:42 AM

—“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE ‘POST-MORAL’?”–

—“Can you explain POST-MORAL to a newb?”— Scott Claremont

So just like we changed from theological(authoritarian) discourse on morals, to philosophical (rational) discourse on morals during the enlightenment, that we have changed from philosophical (rational) discourse on morals, to scientific (measurements) discourse on morals.

|Explanation(Model)| traditional(norm) > religious (theology) > rational (moral) > scientific (reciprocity).

It means (a) our language consists of reasoning by morality( intuition, habit, norm, tradition) rather than reasoning by reciprocity(measurement),(b) and where morality(intuition, habit, norm, tradition) vary not only between groups, but between individuals, reciprocity does not. (c) as such we can use the language of law (decidability), accounting (directly measurable), and economics ( indirectly measurable) to measure that which removes ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit from our discussion of ‘morality’, and describe human actions scientifically (universally) rather than normatively (colloquially).