—“You are the one insisting on specific terms and frameworks. -Lol. Are there measures of insulation and protection? Yes. Are they self sufficient and unrelated to everything else? No. See, you have a box you’re comfortable playing in, but reality extends way beyond its walls.”—
I’m just MEASURING CHANGES IN CAPITAL. It’s not an opinion. It’s just what exists. There is nothing undecidable by change in capital, any more than change in property, and as such, we see all peoples, all states, in all history operating by this test of reciprocity.
So again, the only reason to DISAGREE is to steal. Humans always and everywhere retaliate at high cost, against theft. I’m just explaining the world. If you don’t like it that isn’t material to me. I don’t do ‘good’ I do ‘true’.
So the test is not abstractions its cases. If you pick any case i will walk through it and you’ll see you’re engaged in theft and justifying it. Well, then I’ll equally justify your prosecution.
That’s what I do: law.
So it doesn’t matter what people think is good or agree is good what matters is that when in dispute science (law) provides decidability.
Art is decidable as is nearly everything.
There is no difference between science and law.
We just like lying and cheating … a lot.
—“Laws in science are merely pragmatic dependabilities and measurements which are artificially created and imposed by humans. Law in government is always a matter of subjective expression that requires interpretation. Laws only exist because of subjective humans.”—Jason Powell
@KillerkattArt
A scientific law is a description (langauge) of constant relations extant in the universe at (so far) increasing degrees of precision (and parsimony).
There is nothing subjective about ohms law. nothing.
There is nothing subjective about Reciprocity.
Nature consists of constant relations. We can describe those constant relations. Math is the language of positional relations, logic of set relations, and operations of humanly possible subjectively testable actions. Law consists in the test of the MOST constant relations possible.
So a) man creates descriptions of physical laws (applications of entropy), and b) man creates descriptions of natural laws (applications of reciprocity), c) judges discover those applications, and d) man issues command, legislation, and regulation, that are rarely if ever ‘law’.