October 10th, 2018 12:28 PM
I‘m not anti-anyone (genetically). If we all practice nationalism then we do not prey upon one another by exporting costs of domestication upon one another, and then can ameliorate our differences through trade, trade policy, and international (natural) law, while producing those commons most suitable to our peoples. I am however against violations of natural law both in display, word, and deed, including those traditions we all rely upon, the group strategies in those traditions, and the means of argument used in perpetuating those strategies. So do I think the people whose strategies are HERD strategies, (Semitic Monotheists, Women, and Gypsies) going to stop following their instincts and traditions? Um no I don’t. Do I think we can fight with our very lives to restore natural law so that we ameliorate those differences through separatism, nations, trade, and law? Yes I do. And I am right, and it is impossible to make a moral argument counter to it, without violating the very law that prevents us from conquering, enserving, enslaving, or worse. So the choice is simple – we either separate and cooperate or we remain artificially unified for the purposes of conquest by the herd, and fight out a bloody civil war. Carry your own genetic water.