(FB 1546008938 Timestamp)
DOOLITTLE VS HUNTINGTON – MINOR DIFFERENCE WITH MAJOR CONSEQUENCES
—â??The underlying problem for the West is not Islamic
Fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose
people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and
are obsessed with the inferiority ol°their power. The problem
for Islam is not CIA orthc US. Department of defense. It is
the West, a different civilisation whose people are convinced
of the universality of their culture and believe that their
superior, if declining, power imposes on them the obligation to impose that culture throughout the world. These are the
basic ingredients that fuel con�ict between Islam and the
West.”— Huntington.
DOOLITTLE’S EXPANSION OF HUNTINGTON:
My position is that it is not just the west against islam (since islam is the only civilization hostile to modernity remaining), but that it is Western Aryanism: Truth, Sovereignty, Agency, and Eugenics and the Male Pack Strategy of Nation States, against Semitic Abrahamism: Deceit, Submission, and Dysgenics, and the female herd strategy of empires of ignorance.
In other words, it is against the Abrahamic Method, and it’s instantiations in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and Marxism (jewish), postmodernism (christian), Feminism (secular), and Islamism (islamic), forms
The evidence is what it is. Nothing can change it.
HUNTINGTON VS DOOLITTLE
It’s not just culture and belief, but the survival and transcendence of mankind rather than it’s continuous devolution and destruction that occurs wherever islam, judaism spread.
Huntington was arguing in the cold war model of political and military strategy.
I’m arguing against extinction of mankind, by the extinction of truth, reason, science, and sovereignty.
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are technologies not of rebellion but of undermining, conquest, consumption, and destruction through devolution and consumption.
Islame consumed each civilization. It is cancer.