TRANSLATING A CRITICISM OF PAUL KRUGMAN
—“I often tell people that America is every bit as class-driven as the UK, if not more so, despite our facade of informality.”—
@paulkrugman
It hasn’t stopped you from continuing your tradition of undermining the martial aristocratic classes at every turn, so that they can’t continue the demand for testimony as the normative mode of speech so that you can practice your baiting in to hazard by false promise.
It’ll soon be common knowledge: your technique of profiting from baiting-into-hazard, using false-promise of circumvention of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, by sophistry and Social Construction, and the lie that Aristocracy oppressed rather than domesticated man.
—“can you translate that into dumbf_ckistanian?”— a Tweeter
Paul tells sophisticated lies that make people believe they can escape a harsh reality. Contrary to traditional European modes of thinking such as testimonial speech.
European man institutionalized court testimony as the normative mode of speech. It’s the most expensive normative construction in human history. The technique (pilpul) that Paul practices is the opposite. Most fascinating subject in history: The art of institutionalizing lying.
In Paul Krugman’s case, he is usually weaving together three or four categories of lies.
… 1-The myth of oppression;
… 2-The false promise of freedom from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, and;
… 3-His pseudoscientific econ that evades full accounting of all changes in capital.
Paul’s particular systemic Fraud is using those three techniques to bait a democratic people into the hazard of abandoning rule of law, markets, the resulting eugenics, and adopting protective (socialist), Semitic (academic/priest-caste), discretionary (authoritarian) rule.
We know how that worked out everywhere else. The Christian and Muslim expansion resulted in over a thousand years of dark age, destroyed every great civilization of the ancient world and reduced them to a uniform totalitarianism, ignorance, poverty, and dysgenia from which they appear unable to escape.
The programs of pseudoscience (boaz, freud, gould,) marxism, socialism, and sophistry (the frankfurt school), and social construction (deceit) via postmodernism, hostile-feminism, and human biodiversity denialism all seek to reverse the restoration of Aristotelianism, the restoration of european ism, and the continuation of the european political tradition of rule of law.
I mean, the Marxists and socialists are only responsible for 100M dead. The feminists are only responsible for the reproductive depopulation of Europeans. The postmodernists are only responsible for destroying truthful speech. The denialists are only responsible for destroying psychology, sociology, politics, and economics.