Jan 9, 2020, 9:10 AM

—“You lose me totally here. It’s ALL about race.”—Cortny

That’s because you’re conflating two issues.

There is no contradiction between ethnonationalism for all to produce optimums for all, and eugenics for all to reduce the worst for all.

In other words under truth (science), under reciprocity and rule of law, with a majority middle class at or above say 105, there is nothing intrinsically bad about any group of humans that prevents them from all the opportunities of western civilization.

“All happy families are the same, all unhappy families are different” and “All domesticatable animals are the same, all undomesticatable animals are different” both express the same argument: a number of things have to go right, any one of which can go wrong and produce failure.

RECIPE

  1. A Heroic Narrative of Truth, Duty, Oath and Contract, Heroism, Excellence, Achievement, Mindfulness and The direction of dominance expression to the production of commons.

  2. Ethnocentrism, Nationalism, The individual as the subject of Law and the Family as the subject of Policy.

  3. Aristotelianism: Realism, Naturalism, Operationalism, Empiricism, Testimonial Truth (science)

  4. Rule of law by Natural Law of Reciprocity and markets in everything, including a Market for the Suppression of parasitism in court

  5. A Power Distribution of law, Pareto Distribution of Capital, and Nash Distribution of Returns.

  6. A majority genetic middle class and the suppression of the reproduction of the underclass (unproductive).

Diversity is a bad. Proximity causes hostility. Both undermine the willingness of peoples to devote resources to the commons and maximize the tragedy of the commons.

We know the answer now. The question is, what people will pursue it, and what people will continue to be a drag on mankind?