I KNOW WHAT BOTHERS YOU ABOUT MY WORK.

—”

I don’t propose a good, or a preference. I state a truth, and I state it prosecutorially, as natural law, that is not open to choice or dispute.

Why? The Victorians civilized greek prose in continuation of their virtue signalling by overextension of christianity to justify their conquest.

The marxists, feminist, postmodernists, and denialists took advantage of our kindness. They took advantage of our virtue signaling. Conservatives failed to resist them, Libertarians only resisted them in the economy, and science has only now falsified them. And they have sought to achieve by immigration and conflict

I don’t make the same mistake.

I don’t write appealing theology you want. I don’t write appeals empathically in moral philosophy to suggest. I don’t write empathic and rational appeals in secular philosophy to persuade.

I write the law. The natural law. The only terms under which cooperation and compromise are preferable to conquest. I’m stating the only terms under which it is rational for us NOT to conquer, rule, tax, enserf, or enslave you, or worse.

Europeans are done asking. They’re done tolerating. They’re done hoping. Science is proving us correct in human differences, just as it proved us correct in economics; just as it has proved us correct in politics.

These are the terms of non conflict.

And honestly, we are hoping you don’t accept them.

You owe us 100M lives. I hope you are are ready to pay the debt.

“—