Mar 8, 2020, 9:28 PM
(P in context. Excellent)
“Schumer says justices will “pay the price” (politically) and that Chief Justice deliberately misinterpreted something he said (aka accused the head of the Supreme Court of lying). Schumer uses the technique of undermining by critique (power seeking).
“I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price … you won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.” – Schumer
“Justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous,” -Roberts said in the statement. “All Members of the Court will continue to do their job, without fear or favor, from whatever quarter.” -Roberts
What is Schumer guilty of? He lies by omission of the fact that he means politically facing a price (false promise). He baits the Chief Justice into hazard by lying. He advocates threat by suggestion (pilpul). He threatens and defends by critique (critical theory) when he said “you won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions”. He escapes liability and warranty as categorizing his dangerous lie as a deliberate misinterpretation. He accused the Chief Justice of lying based on his pretense of plausible deniability. He deliberately avoids due diligence (failed to mention it is only a “political price”, obscuring the ability to disambiguate his meaning). Deliberately doubles down and doubles down for “Attention, Reward (pro?t), In?uence (power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Con?ict ” (and retaliation cycles) “, Generating Demand for Authority” and demand for a state with even greater monopolistic authoritarian discretionary power rather than power from rule of law for protecting trust and markets.
He’s a public figure lying to the public, in matters public, which results in real world damage to capital and property. It will not be allowed under a propertarian constitution. You can sue these people, take them to court and get rewarded restitution in court against these a-holes once in for all. It applies to both sides, though. No more lies!
This….only this. End this.
“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (pro?t), In?uence (power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Con?ict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”
~ Adam Jacob Robert Walker