EVOLUTION VS INTELLIGENT DESIGN

(core)

—“Are you saying you support Darwanism over Christianity or intelligent design?”—Mark E. Haney

1 – I cannot falsify evolution and every single evidence from the fundamental structure of the universe to the imagination of man is a product of a very small number of possibilities in very great permutation, just as limited numbers of sounds, characters, and numbers can be arranged in infinitely complex permutations.

2 – The five rules of christianity are, logically, rationally(incentives), scientifically(empirically) the optimum prisoner’s dilemma (trust building) strategy, and I cannot falsify either or their relation. There is a reason christians are wealthier than competing cults.

3 – Information can only be stored in some memory or other, information stored must be abstracted (generalized) in order to consume less calories and volume that the original matter and its changes in state over time. I cannot falsify that statement – it’s a physical and logical impossibility.

As to what I ‘Support’:

I support truthful speech.

Truthful speech can only consist of what I can testify to.

I can only testify to that which is:

– categorically consistent

– Logically consistent

– empirically(observably) consistent

– operationally consistent

– rationally consistent

– reciprocally consistent

where

– parsimonious

– scope consistent

– and fully accounted

– within stated limits

and where

– due diligence has been demonstrated,

and where

– one’s statements are warrantied by restitution if one errs.

I cannot testify to anything other than.

  1. Realism,

  2. Naturalism,

  3. Operationalism

Nor can anyone else.