For every reference you use, express it as a position in a spectrum of at least three different states all of which share the same measurement (constant relation).
The reason most things seem clearer or more insightful is that I use series’ of operational definitions to limit (as do all grammars) and emphasize, the constant relation I wish to illustrate.
By describing a spectrum from coming into existence, to dropping from existence (failure) you create a definition wherein the priority of the properties of the category (causality) is not open to conflation or misinterpretation.
And that is how Abrahamism causes deception: conflation and redirection (suggestion).