The progress of our understanding from optimism and ignorance to pessimism and certainty.
|Evolution| Social Democracy -> Classical liberalism -> Libertarianism -> Anarcho Capitalism -> Neo-Reaction -> Propertarianism -> Fascism
The problem with Propertarianism for other groups is that it’s law not literature, and as law it is unforgiving (intolerant) of falsehood, pretenses of knowledge or goodness whereas almost every other method of argument makes use of pretenses of truth, knowledge, and good in order to achieve an end that does NOT require truth, knowledge, and reciprocity.
Why? Because we rally around (politically and socially) discounts that are obtained by use of falsehoods, pretenses, and irreciprocity.
So the question is always and everywhere, why one would pursue one’s ends (power) by means of discounting using falsehood, pretense, and irreciprocity (fraud), rather than pursue them honestly and restitutionally (restitution) by violence, or honestly and predatorily (predation) by violence – other than (a) one has no chance of achieving other by coercion or violence.
In other words, why pursue a failure other than to avoid action in pursuit of a success?
All we ask in propertarianism is to impose reciprocity by violence as a means of restitution.