As always, I’m running a test with multiple ambitions:

  1. Are Christians really all nothing more than virtue signaling cucks, hiding behind a veil faith to mask cowardice, laziness, and lack of agency, or will they fight for their people? We almost never find a ‘devout’ Christian willing to fight. Ever. They always have an excuse. They won’t show up without a guarantee. They won’t fight until it doesn’t matter, and like women with small children, wantto show up and get an everbody-wins-prize if other men do the winning. I mean, isn’t christian tolerance just an excuse to gossip rally and shame while one leftist program after another undermines our civlization? Does christian really mean “I’m a domesticated human farm animal and I need to follow the herd in safety, ignorance and bliss?

  2. Can we shame Christians into restoring masculinity to Christianity? Catholicism is dead in the next generation right? Traditional protestant denominations are dead. We only have the Evangelicals. About half go secular and half evangelical, and we’re gong to run out of christians to go evangelical soon. So, do we have to bring in Orthodoxy? How do we de-feminize de-loser Christianity? Because Orthodoxy works. Why? They don’t appeal to the trend, they stay with tradition.

  3. Can we shame or criticize them into the reality that it doesn’t matter if you OBEY scripture or dogma without question; or if you follow jesus’ example, even if biblical prose is ‘for children’(Spiritualism, Deism); or if you do so because traditionally it has worked (Rational Choice); or understand that natural law and jesus’ example is the scientifically optimum strategy for cooperation – especially in a commercial polity (Scientific Choice)?

  4. Or do we have to just assume all Christians are dead weight, will not fight for anything, will just coower at home and whine, and that we need to restore a pagan religion to save western civlization?