Our solution unites Science with Law in defense of the informational commons, regardless of who testifies (speaks), and the manner in which he speaks (spoken, written, media) – and what he testifies to, when in public to the public about matters public.
Source date (UTC): 2020-03-16 17:14:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239601000568291328
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239600997271506944
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
Philosophy considers lying an act of intention. The Law considers lying (or any irreciprocity) a failure of due diligence regardless of intention. Science differs from Law only in Science’s defense of the informational commons from false testimony by scientists.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1239600997271506944
Leave a Reply