Philosophy considers lying an act of intention. The Law considers lying (or any

Philosophy considers lying an act of intention. The Law considers lying (or any irreciprocity) a failure of due diligence regardless of intention. Science differs from Law only in Science’s defense of the informational commons from false testimony by scientists.


Source date (UTC): 2020-03-16 17:14:43 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239600997271506944

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1239600996088758274


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

Philosophy presumes the positive, and asks whether questions are true or false, and preferable or good, or not. Law presumes the erroneous, dishonest, or fraudulent, and asks whether questions are testifiable or untestifiable, and whether reciprocal and warrantable or not.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1239600996088758274

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *