PHILOSOPHY IN THE SPECTRUM OF DECIDABILITY
(Notice the order) (Notice how producing an ordered series makes attacks by empty verbalisms almost impossible)
— Correspondence —
*Reason: comparisons of differences in order to produce decidability by preference or necessity.
*Logic: the use of reason to identify general rules of internal consistency, for use in testing the internal consistency of propositions.
*Law: the declaration of general rules of decidability in matters of conflict, in populations large enough for extra-familial commons to develop. Laws evolve internal consistency out of the necessity of decidability in matters with multiple causes.
*Philosophy: the use of reason and information to produce a set of internally consistent general rules of decidability within domains of varying scale – including ‘complete’ scale: science.
*History: a reduction of the complexity of past reality to an internally consistent narrative, as externally correspondent as feasible, for the purpose of providing information, for use in ideation or decidability.
*Literature: the use of narrative to produce an internally consistent, existentially possible, but not externally correspondent alternative to history. (conflation of mythology and history)
—- Limits of Correspondence—
( Invocation of dream states for the purpose of suggestion)
Mythology: the use of pseudo-historical, super-normal, or super-natural narrative used to produce a set of internally related if not internally consistent explanations in the absence of history. Note that super-normal, (impossible heroes), anthropomorphism( attributing human characteristics to non human objects), and supernatural (impossible non-human characters) and extra natural ( other-worlds) are demonstrated in various myths.
Theology: The conflation of Mythology and Law for the purpose of producing an internally consistent method of decidability and justification for the use of exclusion or the application of force in cross-tribal groups.
Occult/NewAge: the conflation of supernaturalism and dream state to produce a purely intutionistic, experiential, and pre-rational, not necessarily consistent but at least framed, method of decidability.
Dream State: free association driven by intuition, independent of reason, or by the intentional avoidance of reason.
Drug State: chemically induced dream state, disabling ability to reason while preserving free association.
====
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2017-02-12 09:35:00 UTC
Leave a Reply