REGARDING BIG What if I can make an unassailable argument that anyone who respec

REGARDING BIG

What if I can make an unassailable argument that anyone who respects property rights, speaks the language, and adheres to basic manners, ethics, morals and norms, is in fact, entitled to some portion of the net proceeds of the overall marketplace?

‘Cause I can.

BHL do not know how to construct such an argument from property rights. So they must rely on sentimental or utilitarian arguments. But it is quite possible to make an argument from property rights.

The BIG cannot be constructed as a fixed benefit.

I don’t like it. But it is possible to make that argument, and I am fairly sure that BIG, at the expense of a multitude of other programs, would in fact, produce libertarian ends.

And I am quite sure that if the conservatives positioned a BIG in exchange for shutting down a whole host of services, that it is a political argument that could be sold.