It’s not that you can’t engage in freedom of contract, it’s that you can’t engage in irreciprocity or conspiracy, regardless of whether those internal or external to the agreement submit to it. In current jurisprudence, only the state can violate contract (constitution).
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 14:44:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174333383268282368
Reply addressees: @danstrawhun @primalpoly
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174332766265270273
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@danstrawhun @primalpoly That ruling violates rule of law. Instead, men can in fact, enter into any contract that they wish, and often do – but the state will not enforce them, and the state may find it irreciprocal, or irreciprocal by externality, or in violation of command, regulation and legislation.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174332766265270273
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@danstrawhun @gmiller That ruling violates rule of law. Instead, men can in fact, enter into any contract that they wish, and often do – but the state will not enforce them, and the state may find it irreciprocal, or irreciprocal by externality, or in violation of command, regulation and legislation.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1174332766265270273
Leave a Reply