That ruling violates rule of law. Instead, men can in fact, enter into any contr

That ruling violates rule of law. Instead, men can in fact, enter into any contract that they wish, and often do – but the state will not enforce them, and the state may find it irreciprocal, or irreciprocal by externality, or in violation of command, regulation and legislation.


Source date (UTC): 2019-09-18 14:42:04 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174332766265270273

Reply addressees: @danstrawhun @primalpoly

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174331668804571136


IN REPLY TO:

@dstrwhn

@curtdoolittle @gmiller “The Constitution does not speak of freedom of contract…. Freedom of contract is a qualified and not an absolute right. There is no absolute freedom to do as one wills or to contract as one chooses.”

W. Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937)

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1174331668804571136

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *