Everyone wants to defend the malinvestment in their frame no matter how ridiculous, art, literature, religion, philosophy, utilitarianism, marxism – whatever – when science is gradually producing the most unambiguous frame. So what is it that you want to produce and why?
Source date (UTC): 2019-09-16 21:01:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173703367794810881
Reply addressees: @Semiogogue
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1173703101716606977
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Semiogogue So I would have to understand WHY you’re trying to do what you’re doing. To undrestand why your approach suits it. Most people want discounted references by increasing homogeneity of narratives required for symbolism to provide discounts on cognition and trust extension.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173703101716606977
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@Semiogogue So I would have to understand WHY you’re trying to do what you’re doing. To undrestand why your approach suits it. Most people want discounted references by increasing homogeneity of narratives required for symbolism to provide discounts on cognition and trust extension.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1173703101716606977
Leave a Reply