Flawless as always. Thank you. 😉

Source date (UTC): 2025-05-08 15:05:47 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920495350747381789

Reply addressees: @ContraFabianist

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920495117116276929

IN REPLY TO:

@ContraFabianist

THE LIBERTARIAN ETHIC VS FULL-ACCOUNTING:

The core difference between the Libertarian Ethic (NAP) and the Propertarian Ethic (Reciprocity) is rooted in two competing methods of measuring (1) the spectrum of property, and (2) the constraints of cooperation within the aforementioned model of property.

The Non-Aggression Principle is conditional on the single dimension of consent; ensuring a narrowing-in on the costs of involuntary transfer at the expense of other costs and externalities. In contrast, the falsificationary layers afforded by measuring reciprocity, expands accounting to the imposition of costs on first-order capital; providing a means to account for informational, behavioural, and selectional irreciprocities — in addition to involuntary transfer. By expanding the scope of property from intersubjectively verifiable scarce resources (libertarian) to the whole spectrum of demonstrated interests, reciprocity affords us the ability to measure the constraints of cooperation to an extent sufficient for decidability in interpersonal conflict across scales (civil>intergroup>civilizational).

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1920495117116276929