RE: “This is super interesting theory.” Explanation Evolutionary processes can’t

RE: “This is super interesting theory.”

Explanation
Evolutionary processes can’t predict or envision they can only discover by accident of recombination. Ergo ‘everything evolves from somewhere’ given there are very few basic principles (I’ve documented all of them).

So the theory is obvious in retrospect and interesting in that it demonstrates the power of basic human instincts to produce fascinating social economic political and strategic permutations at large scales. 😉

In other words, this ‘theory’ is the most parsimonious solution to the question of behavior: it’s just polarity discovering states of equilibrium results in evolutionary computation of increasing energy and mass, which results in the ternary logic, then the polarity sex differences resulting in the ternary logic of human evolutionary computation, the resulting three means of coercion, the resulting three institutions of coercion, and the resulting sequence of the evolution of those institutions of coercion producing all civilizational differences. Add the detail that those sex differences are reducible to responsibility seeking in time, and empathizing vs systematizing to assist in that responsibility seeking, then there isn’t a lot that can’t be readily explained by just this one paragraph. 😉

That’s why we say that the method and the law are hard to learn. But once you do, the world is extraordinarily simple, and as such, we gain mindfulness from true. knowledge rather than false belief. 😉

Reply addressees: @patriciamdavis @MahmoudEng4 @RobOU812Rob @TheAutistocrat @_faraharif