No. I didn’t. I’m explaining the summary of the research in operational terms. T

No. I didn’t. I’m explaining the summary of the research in operational terms. That’s my job: synthesis of cross-domain knowledge, by universal commensurability by reduction to construction from first principles (irreducible scientific facts.) But you probably don’t even understand what you just read.

Conversely, you didn’t demonstrate you can comprehend sites or even disagree, or even opine by countering with an argument or cite yourself.

This is how I know you’re lying that you have any knowledge whatsoever and are just interjecting feminine disapproval (feminine, leftist, undermining in lieu of competency and argument.)

No one that follows me ever assumes I don’t know the science. Because I only work from the science.

Unlike you, who works from fictional narratives and emotions. 😉

Reply addressees: @mactavish