Like I said. Basic econ. 101. I understand ‘hidden’ causality in financial syste

Like I said.
Basic econ. 101.
I understand ‘hidden’ causality in financial systems because the paradigm and vocabulary are subject to the same problems of all economic transactions.
As far as I. know I’m still the first person to produce an AI for legal arguments, and I did it in the late 80’s. We melted printers with it. And overwhelmed courts with it.
I’m still trying to figure out what argument you’re making and all I see is the typical problem of each generation thinking it’s invented something that was invented two generation before, and giving it a new name.
There are always possible means of discovering commensurability despite unknown causality. We do it all the time. All mathematics is statistical at some level (approximate).
I’m still not seeing what you’re trying to argue other than a different language for the process of buttering toast. 😉

I’m not closed to some idea.
I just keep seeing you make the same claim that we’ve know for a century, and is the reason we need different logics.