RE: Religious frame. Is the religious frame cause, or consequence? I can find no

RE: Religious frame.
Is the religious frame cause, or consequence?
I can find no case where it’s not a consequence.
We justify. Religions justify. We need only decompose and disambiguate what it is they justify. There is nothing good in christianity that was not in greco roman thought, and everything bad in christianity (judaism, islam) is an introgression of fraud into western thought.

Difference? Western thought began as aristocratic negotiation. Middle eastern thought began as peasant manipulation and organization. So Christianity provided a means by which the slaves, underclass, immigrants, and women could find respect and virtue in ‘doing no wrong to the commons’ versus respect and virtue ‘in doing good for the commons’ that was the principle of aristocratic religion.

Unfortunately, instead of continuing the progress of the Sol Invictus character that integrated into the model, the Christian (seditious) model that also UNDERMINED the aristocracy, their arts, letters, reason, ethics, morals, religion, tradition, and institutions, and fed the honor of the high cost of military participation that made Rome possible – was a preference.

So the Jewish Christianity of the church destroyed the ancient world from within just as much as Islam destroyed the ancient world from without.

Same as today.