2) The primary problem is reversing common property under presumption of ongoing

2) The primary problem is reversing common property under presumption of ongoing liability under monogamy, back to separation of children (Female) vs the polity (Male). Esp given earlier entry into workplace, No economic reason for shared cost of offspring. It’s just empirical.


Source date (UTC): 2022-05-17 15:28:44 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1526585517827145728

Reply addressees: @torovolt

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1526584756846178304


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@torovolt 1) I don’t think we can normalize polygamy. I do see a continuation of the division between upper-class monogamy (capital) and all other classes (no capital) returning to serial relationships as was the historical norm, esp with longer lifetimes.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1526584756846178304

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *