Perhaps this is the point that is obvious to me in the statement ‘a universal paradigm, vocabulary, grammar, and logic of universal commensurability and decidability regargless of context assumes all parties diverge from natural law, but dedidability between them remains.
Source date (UTC): 2022-02-21 19:05:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495837123404079111
Reply addressees: @Imperius__13
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495836514340806664
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Imperius__13 Maybe this is what is unintuitive: that it’s not so much that one interpretation is true and one is false, but the degree to which any interpretation varies from decidability. All variations from decidabiilty are in ignorance, bias, deceit, fraud, undermining, and destruction.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1495836514340806664
Leave a Reply