Meaning therefore is necessary to bridge gaps between that most parsimonious par

Meaning therefore is necessary to bridge gaps between that most parsimonious paradigm, and all other paradigms. But that all paradigms will over time converge on this single paradigm – which is what we have seen everywhere across all time. But theo-philo-ideo will always exist.


Source date (UTC): 2022-02-21 18:42:10 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495831226153943043

Reply addressees: @Imperius__13

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1495830645054001156


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@Imperius__13 I’m not saying that. (we talk past each other a lot) I’m saying that there is one most parsimonious paradigm, vocabulary and grammar, and that I’ve codified it, and given its universal decidability, very little if anything at human scale will change.
But Decidabilty != Meaning.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1495830645054001156

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *