3)(a)Torcaso v. Watkins – Cannot deny rights to an atheist because of a religiou

3)(a)Torcaso v. Watkins – Cannot deny rights to an atheist because of a religious test
(b)Wisconsin v. Yoder – Religious practice does not require belief in a supreme being.


Source date (UTC): 2022-01-18 16:45:59 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483480799525670913

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483480797868867592


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

2) A religion only requires a false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe in exchange for mindfulness (neural economy).
http://naturallawinstitute.com/a-religion-doesnt-require-the-supernatural/
(See my work on the abrahamic method of deceit for the technical means by which social construction of such deceits are made)

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1483480797868867592

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *