@Evidently There are very few other possibilities. It’s possible that there are

@Evidently There are very few other possibilities. It’s possible that there are NO other possibilities. This is simply a matter of the combinatorics of forces, particles, elements, and molecules, in an environment of sufficient free energy, within a narrow temperature range. So just as very little of the universe resulted in mass, less in stars, less in planets, it appears that the number of means of ‘calculating’ stable relations is very narrow.

Every single thing we discover in all the sciences trends to a very simple constitution and organization of the universe, from which a narrow range of evolutionary computation is possible.

Much of the ‘woo woo’ in physics today (and the lack of scientific progress because of it) is due to a misunderstanding of mathematics and a strange taboo in the sciences against producing theoretical systems despite the misunderstanding of mathematics.

It looks like the universe is much more simple than we thought, and that we are currently prisoners of some equivalent of ‘taboos’ from the prevoius century. And the presumption that enisteinian mathematics was other than an approximation that has failed to survive the tests of scale – just as did newton.