THE UNIFICATION OF SCIENCE, LAW, PHILOSOPHY, AND RELIGION Now dead friend, David

THE UNIFICATION OF SCIENCE, LAW, PHILOSOPHY, AND RELIGION

Now dead friend, David, fellow traveler, student of world religions, computerizing and quoting every primary book by author. Looks at me:

• “I thought you were a teacher, but you’re a prophet. Teacher’s speak. Prophet’s roar.” –
  

It was so odd but I begin to understand what he meant.

Not that I want this to be interpreted as self-aggrandizement but that P results in the unification of science, philosophy, and religion, into a single system of thought that’s disruptive of all others: a ‘Roar’.

I don’t matter. I’m just born in the right time and place.

That said, given that under P, there is no difference between science, law, philosophy, and religion, then perhaps prophet as disruptor is as good a label as scientist, law-giver, or philosopher. It’s just a matter of which grammar (vocabulary) you use to convey the same meaning.

Because under P, we observe the grammars as a spectrum of graceful increase in precision at the cost of meaning, or graceful decrease in precision to decrease the cost of meaning.

All that matters is that the paradigm is consistent, correspondent, reciprocal, and possible.