Since P-Law solves the liar’s paradox (and that entire logical category, includi

Since P-Law solves the liar’s paradox (and that entire logical category, including in set theory) there are no paradoxes in P-Law. If so, then we are just engaging in error, sophistry, or deceit, usually using bad grammar, violating the law of continuous recursive disambiguation. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1431252313394622471