7. So I read through this work and it’s internally consistent. There are no leaps in logic. The math is about right. He’s as ‘offended’ by the system as Eric W, but I can see through that in both cases. Wolfram and Lisi aren’t looking for others to fund them so it matters less.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-21 14:57:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095373591699460
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095372337647618
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
6. Now, back to this physicist. I read through his work and it starts with the premise that space is ‘something’. That’s ok. That’s a fine premise. We don’t need to know how everything functions, only how we increase the precision of our present understanding (which is weak).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1429095372337647618
Leave a Reply