An intellectually honest criticism would have to provide a competitive argument on rational and scientific grounds that belief(fundamentalism) or imitation of belief(tradition) are necessary for social coherence between empathizers(F) and systematizers(M) on evidence of outcomes
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-12 15:07:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425836285214740480
Reply addressees: @Catholi64501821 @iamnotasophist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1425835160180768770
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Catholi64501821 @iamnotasophist You used the Abrahamic(female) technique of Critique by GSRRM to create a false equivalency between empathizing(intuition) and systematizing(reason) by applying empathizing priorities to systematizing priorities, where atheists correctly criticize empathizers on empathic grounds.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1425835160180768770
Leave a Reply