So the reason LK2 is mistaken is that MU is an incomplete statement open to suggestion (an unbalanced formula), and as such fails to account for novelty, and novelty (+acquisition) is not produced by prices alone – only upon expansion of MU to a general rule of behavior.
Source date (UTC): 2021-06-30 14:36:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1410245795526414345
Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1410245401681276934
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Lord_Keynes2 Not that y’all need my input but MU refers to the change in price as one consumes or sells an inventory. Over time, we’ve applied MU as a general rule of behavior since it does in fact describe all neurological processes because all such processes seek novelty: +consumption.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1410245401681276934
Leave a Reply