11. I have been unable to discover any pretense of philosophical undecidability that isn’t a malformed statement (as in mathematical grammar), that violates a variation of the promise of continuous recursive disambiguation, producing a transaction for meaning plus due diligence.
Source date (UTC): 2021-04-18 19:57:07 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383872238089228291
Reply addressees: @_notmo
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1383871664203571202
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@_notmo 10. Which consists of Names(Referents), statements(transformations), sentences (transactions), narratives(ledgers), and consent/not(balances) in communication, with additional continjuous recursive disambiguation as due dilligence against error, bias, deceit both parties.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1383871664203571202
Leave a Reply