It’s more correct to say that (a) Babbage failed to inspire an operationalist(co

It’s more correct to say that (a) Babbage failed to inspire an operationalist(computational) movement. It took war and Turing. (b) the set-theoretic model of mathematics was a failure, and caused the set-theoretic model of language (philosophy) that was also a failure.


Source date (UTC): 2020-11-02 17:09:42 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323311332742078464

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323311330481311744


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

The subject deserves a long treatment, but the underlying issue is the limits of set logic vs operational logic. Praxiology is NOT axiomatic(deductive and justificationary) but operational(Constructive and falsificationary) – Mises and Rothbard were punching above their weight. https://twitter.com/BobMurphyEcon/status/1323281381259169792

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1323311330481311744

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *