4) But we have no way of getting to that discussion. If we did then it’s possible for right and left to have a scientific discussion of strategy and policy rather than shallow moralizing that is really just politics by sophistry and pseudoscience.
Source date (UTC): 2020-11-01 15:33:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322924759244570641
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322924757365522432
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
3) Eric is a mathematical economist but w/o full accounting. But he’s one of the only people who can meaningfully discuss ‘mathiness’ problem he’s encountered in physics and economics but hasn’t himself escaped. For fellow supernerds this is probably the fundamental problem.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322924757365522432
Leave a Reply