3) That failing is the reason for the obvious failure by “mathiness” in economics and subatomic physics. Only slightly less obvious in psychology and sociology. Far less so in law. And not at all intuitive in political development.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-31 21:13:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647949797662723
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1322647948489068545
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
2) And I think the problem that plagued all thinkers in the 20th was the same: computation and neural networks came too late: Babbage didn’t provoke a revolution. So that everyone in the 20th wasn’t able to frame processes as operational calculations.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1322647948489068545
Leave a Reply