So I keep trying to abstract one step into the civilizational layer and you keep

So I keep trying to abstract one step into the civilizational layer and you keep anchored in one person. In other words, in the absence of comparative religion, civilization, strategy, and ARGUMENT you aren’t aware and can’t compare frames of reference, and the resulting biases.


Source date (UTC): 2020-07-30 15:38:10 UTC

Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288861452107952128

Reply addressees: @Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3

Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1288860532372643841


IN REPLY TO:

Unknown author

@Coronakrise5 @bishkebab3 This helps us diagnose why for example, Confucious couldn’t solve the problem of politics. Or why European trifunctionalism is so complicated we couldn’t understand it ourselves. Or why the Semitic world specialized in lying. Or why the Gypsies specialized in petty crime.

Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1288860532372643841

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *